Talk:Angur Ada raid

A news item involving Angur Ada raid was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 5 September 2008.

Wikipedia

Pakistan

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / North America / South Asia / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	United States military history task force

I have modified the box about the 'War in Pakistan'[edit]

In order to distinguish between pakistani and the highly controversiel attacks by the US inside Pakistan, which Pakistan is against. However there is a problem with the width. Perhapos someone can help?Nick Finnsbury (talk) 12:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is the presence of 10 ISI agents with the SF guys not cited?[edit]

it seem to be a pretty extreme claim... 169.252.4.21 (talk) 22:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see more information on this. if it's true, it would be a rather big deal considering all other current information out there indicates that the US has insinuated that the ISI itself has ties to terrorist organizations. it would be rather suprising to see US military working directly with them to carry out a raid on pakistani soil against the wishes of the rest of the pakistani government and as part of the "war against terror" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.166.226.62 (talk) 17:12, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It makes one wonder why the Pakastani government would have warned of their right to retaliate. --Evb-wiki (talk) 17:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If nobody can find a source for this should we just go ahead and remove it? 74.183.227.6 (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Evb-wiki (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modify the infobox?[edit]

It might be a good idea to fix up the infobox, right now there is no citation given for the presence of the Pakistani ISI agents onboard the helicopters with the U.S. S.F.s. Indeed if they were on board then it would implicitly imply that the Pakistani government (or at least some members of it) had given approval for the operation.

The other point is that the infobox should mention that the identity of the members of the village that were killed is still uncertain. Perhaps some Islamic militants were there but it seems that there were also women and children killed, were they Taliban too? --I (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angur Ada raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080909101158/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk:80/default.asp?page=2008%5C09%5C04%5Cstory_4-9-2008_pg1_3 to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2008%5C09%5C04%5Cstory_4-9-2008_pg1_3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Angur Ada raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]