From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Websites / Computing   
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Fair use rationale for Image:Answerbaglogo.png[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Answerbaglogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Answerbag rating system[edit]

The rating system has changed from 'helpful', etc., to a points-based system. This change happened many months ago, and users can decide how many points to give a question or an answer. The more user points anyone has (from being given those points by other users for contributions), the more points they can give to others for any given question or answer. Positive points count both towards the answer's rating and the user's individual rating; negative points only count towards the answer or question and do not affect the user's personal rating. At the moment, for example, I am at level 37 (professor with 7,746 points) and can give anywhere from -4 to +5 for an answer and -4 to + 4 for a question. Grandma Roses (talk) 15:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Faulty deletion review[edit]

It isn't clear that the editors that reviewed the deletion request were doing their due diligence as they thought the deletion request was done in bad faith. Irrespective of the "faith", consistent application of the site rules should trump personal opinion. As far as notability issues are concerned, many of the links that the first two editors included are weak, at best (except for perhaps the Everything else is either a blog, the subject of one website ( a site where anyone can submit an article), or from a "direct marketing" website. Maybe an experienced editor can explain how those are notable in their own right? Maybe actually reading the articles themselves would be considered legitimate editorial oversite. Mudfud (talk) 23:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

how about a list of Answer sites made. It is clear that Category:Knowledge markets don't include sites like Blurtit, Fluther, and Dizzay, or for that matter, the Wikipedia: Reference Desk here.Civic Cat (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC).

Sanctions and Levels of Users[edit]

I don't think that sanctions were needed in this article. Also the 'levels of users' don't really add much to the article. Anyone else agree here? NCSS (talk) 22:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

how are points earned on Answerbag[edit]

The article fails to mention how points are earned. For example on yahoo answers it's 2 points per answer, 1 point for voting and 10 points for best answer. Asking costs 5 points on yahoo answers. How on answerbag are points scored? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:36, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Answerbag seems to be history now.[edit]

This message is on their homepage. ' is no longer available. Thank you for your patronage.' It is very recent - I was just posting on the site a few hours ago. Grandma Roses (talk) 00:48, 16 December 2015 (UTC) Answerbag reopened on Oct.20,2016. But it is less than half complete. The most noticeable is no categories. Also run by Copyright 2016, Wire Ivy, LLC Which is an unsearchable unknown entity. Registration is impossible for many people. You can not enter info due to a glitch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Answerbag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:27, 7 July 2017 (UTC)