Talk:Anthology 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject The Beatles (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Albums (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Sessions[edit]

The Let it Be sessions were earlier than the Abbey Road sessions, Abbey Road was released before the production on Let it Be was complete. I've changed the wording to reflect this.Ozzykhan 19:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Disc 2 Track Notations[edit]

Where are all the track notations (Mono, Take 1, etc.) on disc two? Can someone who knows them add them? I would, but I am several hundred miles from my copies of the CD's

I was under the impression that I had added the track notations. I'm on it. IAmAgentMunky 01:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of the discussion was keep.

The article for the song A Beginning gives no indication of why it is notable. I see no reason there should be a seperate article for it. Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Oppose — It's certainly less notable than most other Beatle-related music, but it's part of an Oscar-winning soundtrack and included on a popular CD. — John Cardinal (talk) 14:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Which Oscar-winning soundtrack is it part of? Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
I got that wrong. it's part of the soundtrack of an Oscar-winning movie. — John Cardinal (talk) 11:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Got it wrong twice. <sigh> The soundtrack was nominated for an Oscar, but didn't win. — John Cardinal (talk) 12:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
OK, found it, it was nominated for a Grammy.
I don't see how being included on a soundtrack and an album makes an individual song notable. Even with a Grammy nomination for the soundtrack. Duffbeerforme (talk) 15:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Oppose: Enough secondary literature available, therefore enough potential to get it to C or B status. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 06:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Where is this secondary literature, did you know of this secondary literature before you suggested that this article should be deleted. Why haven't you improved the article instead of suggesting it's deletion? Still trying to make a point? Duffbeerforme (talk) 14:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Very funny indeed. You may repeat it as often as you wish, but still I never suggested anything for deletion. I just don't know where you get this from. It may be your wish, your fetish or whatever, but that can't be my problem... BTT: For secondary literature I made a brief look at books.google.com and the results were overwhelming. There's enough 3rd party coverage to even write an A class article. And this does not include dozens of magazine articles and interviews. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 17:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Oppose : Enough with the minimalism already. WP is becoming more of a source for things we already know rather than new info. --Kaizer13 (talk) 16:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anthology 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required on behalf of editors regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification, as with any edit, using the archive tools per instructions below. This message updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 1 May 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)