Talk:Aortic aneurysm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Medicine / Cardiology (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (marked as High-importance).
 

Aortic dissection[edit]

Care needs to be taken not to duplicate. Dissection I take to mean the splitting of layer of a blood vessel, vs aneurysm to be a stretched dilatation. An aneurysm may go on to dissect or rupture. Aortic dissection is a really comprehensive article and needs care in how we move any information over to Aortic Aneurism.. David Ruben 20:16, 15 August 2005 (UTC)


This article seems to focus primarily on AAAs rather than aneurysms in general........ me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.133.139.5 (talk) 18:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Strange opening sentence[edit]

While the stretched vessel may occasionally cause discomfort, it is the risk of rupture causing severe pain, massive internal hemorrhage and, without prompt treatment, resulting in a quick death.

It is ... resulting in a quick death. This string of words doesn't make much sense to me. I'm not sure how it ought to be rewritten though. -- Sy / (talk) 22:11, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree

Surgical Treatment[edit]

I removed "Media:cd3.mov," because it linked to a file that does not exist. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=Cd3.mov) Gamecheater2009 18:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Operative details for aortic aneurysm graft[edit]

I am an editor of www.wikisurgery.com. This is a free surgical wiki that focusses on operative detail, to a depth unlike any other wiki or indeed any operative surgical text book.

Wikisurgery also contains unique online training programs in basic surgical skills and basic laparoscopic skills, plus information for surgical patients.

I think that wikipedia users would find this information a new extension of their knowledge base.

Can you suggest a way of the wikipedian administration evaluating wikisurgery with a view to forming some sort of linkage?

Michael Harpur Edwards 10:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Great! We can add a link under the 'external links' section. Whats the link to the specific page for details on AAA repair technique? BakerStMD T|C 17:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Separate page on Aortic aneurysm rupture[edit]

I've thought for some time that there should be a separate page for Aortic aneurysm rupture, rather than a link to AAA, because neither the page for AAA nor this one adequately address the topic. Other people agree? BakerStMD T|C 17:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done at Aortic rupture BakerStMD T|C 01:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Percutaneous intervention[edit]

doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.006512 (Circulation). JFW | T@lk 12:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aortic aneurysm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Cerebrospinal fluid drainage[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aortic_aneurysm#Surgery subheading "open surgery" paragraph of this page.

I was here to update the 2004 Cochrane review used in this paragraph to the 2014 version. Conclusion from the Cochrane review states: "There are limited data supporting the role of CSFD in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery for prevention of neurological injury. Further clinical and experimental studies are indicated." The wikipedia paragraph presently reads: "The aorta and its branching arteries are cross-clamped during open surgery. This can lead to inadequate blood supply to the spinal cord, resulting in paraplegia, when repairing thoracic aneurysms. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage, when performed in experienced centers, reduces the risk of ischemic spinal cord injury by increasing the perfusion pressure to the spinal cord.[15][16][needs update]"

Ref 16 is the Cochrane review I am updating. The conclusions are the same. Does anyone know what common surgical practice is for this?

For now, I propose the following edit: A 2004 systematic review and meta analysis found that cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CFSD), when performed in experienced centers, reduces the risk of ischemic spinal cord injury by increasing the perfusion pressure to the spinal cord.[15] A 2012 Cochrane systematic review noted that further research regarding the effectiveness of CFSD for preventing a spinal cord injury is required. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23076900

If you have any feedback on this, it would be appreciated. Thanks, JenOttawa (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

[1]your proposed text seems well thought out and would benefit the article...IMO--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback! @Ozzie10aaaa: JenOttawa (talk) 15:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC)