Talk:Aphasia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Medicine / Neurology (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Neurology task force (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Disability (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon Aphasia is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 



Correcting Errors and Expanding Broca's and Wernicke's Aphasia[edit]

Glancing over the article, it seems as though there are some generalizations that are inaccurate when discussing Aphasia. The area talking about Broca's and Wernicke's Aphasia also could use some expansion.Catroger (talk) 15:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Localizationist model - of historical interest only?[edit]

The model of aphasia describe in this section is rather archaic, and also rather dense and difficult to understand. I suggest it might work better if moved to a section on History?

In popular culture[edit]

Added an in popular culture to aid cultural awareness of aphasia. Needs expanding though!

History and Types edits[edit]

The History of Aphasia section is a bit scarce, which I would like to add more information or integrate it into another section. Also in the types of Aphasia section, there are only a few that have been expanded on further down in the article, but I would also like to add more information about the types not discussed more n depth. The Glass Fox (talk) 17:27, 13 April 2017 (UTC)