Talk:Apollo Lunar Module
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Apollo Lunar Module article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|WikiProject Spaceflight||(Rated C-class, High-importance)|
|This article is written in American English (labor, traveled, realize, defense), and some terms used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.|
Correction at "Masses" in Description
It should be: "Total at beginning of Descent" or "mission payload", "total at end of descent", and "total at ascent" the "total" in the Mass description its disturbing...
Productions Flights: Perilune
This article currently says:
"This meant that the complete spacecraft, including the CSM, orbited the Moon with a 9.1-nautical-mile (16.9 km) perilune, enabling the LM to begin its powered descent from that altitude with a full load of descent stage fuel, leaving more reserve fuel for the final approach. The CSM would then raise its perilune back to the normal 9.1 nautical miles (16.9 km).".
It appears that both the powered descent altitude perilune and the CSM's "normal" orbital perilune should not both be 9.1 nautical miles. At least one of these must be wrong. Also, there should be some standard of hyphenating or not hyphenating "9.1 nautical miles".
- Thanks for catching my mistake; the normal perilune was around 60 nautical miles. As for hyphenation, the standard is built into the Template:Convert: "9.1-nautical-mile" is used as an adjective, so the hyphen is used to separate the number and the unit. (Someone apparently thought the appropriate style was also to insert the hyphen between words of a compound unit, "nautical-mile".) JustinTime55 (talk) 15:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
"The Lunar Module was the first, and to date only, manned spacecraft to operate exclusively in the airless vacuum of space.
- The International Space Station is engineered to work in the vacuum of space. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewota (talk • contribs) 04:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- I guess that depends on one's definition of spacecraft, and whether or not it includes space stations. Space stations obviously don't survive landing on moons or planets, and certainly Skylab didn't. - BilCat (talk) 04:44, 26 December 2015 (UTC)