Talk:Apollonian and Dionysian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


WikiProject Philosophy (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm moving this here, because of WP:OR and WP:RS:

Conceptual Examples & Markers

Please explain your reasons for inserting it again if you choose to do so. Lapaz 20:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Did anyone consider including Cygnus_X-1_series from Rush_(band)?

Franciozzy 12:52, 13 April 2011 (BST)

Nietzsche=German Philosophy?[edit]

Actually, Schelling used these terms before Nietzsche did. -- (talk) 19:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Bach Cantata BWV 201[edit]

Does'nt Geschwinde, ihr wirbelnden Winde, BWV 201, deals with this subject? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


It seems to me that Paglia's conception does not "diverge significantly" from Nietzsche's but is entirely incompatible with his. Given this, some reference as to why he is an "admitted influence" on her would be handy. It's exceeding nonsense in any case... Fbunny (talk) 11:24, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

'controversial' on camille paglia's book[edit]

No need for the word 'controversial' on camille paglia's book. any book can be called controversial and it seems to me unnecessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akivaragen (talkcontribs) 18:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)