Talk:Arboretum Zürich

"red links" of imho not encyclopedic content

Hi, imho it's not recommended to establish red links that potentially hardly will result in EN-WP articles, so as even two in one section of Arboretum Zürich#Seebad Enge: one imho an architect nor known in its home country neither international, and the other ohne the lido, at least i'll not create as commercial and no more a public bath ... btw: also one reference is imho 'miss-corrected'. regards, Roland zh (talk) 02:05, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Since you do not live in Zurich and probably never has, you cannot know how popular the Seebad Enge actually is. And since you do not speak German, at least not very good, and definitely not as your mother language (like you claim in your user page), you cannot know that a public bath (öffentliches Bad) in German does not mean that it belongs to the state, but that it is available to everybody, whether it is owned by a private institution or not.

I am not an architecture expert, but since you even mentions him...

What is wrong with which link?

-- ZH8000 (talk) 13:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed)

== <FYI> and to the attention of Wikipedia administrators related to User:ZH8000 ==

<FYI> and summarizing to the kind attention of Wikipedia administrators that should be interested in to prevent that negative behaviour of User:ZH8000:

1. After all, the username User:ZH8000 may suggest that's an account used by the City government of Zürich, and hence that user's negative behaviour may reflect discredit on the city of Zürich, and definitely on other Swiss Wikipedia users.
2. As a consequence, the Government of the city of Zürich (Stadtkanzlei) has been contacted on February 27, 2015, so the city may prevent the misuse of that username.
3. Logical arguments, obviously listed in the section addressed to that user, linked and pointed to in English, and even in his mother tongue Swiss German, may be ignored again.
4. Evidently he dos'n attend to discuss, neither attends to argue logical and without repeatadly personal attacks (see Talk:Quaianlagen (Zürich) on Febr 27, 2015,
5. nor according to his own edits even to have a minimum of respect or piety to the work of other Wikipedia users.
6. Hence, that user is trolling, and defames repeatedly (an)other user(s) by personal attacks without any consequences by Wikipedia administators, shame on you.
7. Related to the Wikipedia database, please immediately fix Quaianlagen (Zürich) that is listed at rland "WikiProject Switzerland/New articls", but definitely not was created by User:ZH8000.

closing,  Question: Is there really no complaints department, to get down to the root of the trouble, and to prevent such a negative impression of the Wikipedia project to outsiders?

summarizing: thank you for taking notice and immediately sanctions against User:ZH8000, in general concerning his behaviour, and to prevent further misuse/harrassments caused by User:ZH8000 by indefinitely blocking that user, 185.12.131.109 (talk) 16:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arboretum Zürich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151001193946/http://www.bevoelkerungsschutz.admin.ch/internet/bs/de/home/themen/kgs/kgs_inventar/a-objekte.parsys.000108.DownloadFile.tmp/zh2015.pdf to http://www.bevoelkerungsschutz.admin.ch/internet/bs/de/home/themen/kgs/kgs_inventar/a-objekte.parsys.000108.DownloadFile.tmp/zh2015.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 17 October 2016 (UTC)