This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I've been searching for authenticity on this paper and cannot find it. Was this not published? What is its provenance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 20:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
The following quotation from the section on "the end of art" thesis is misleading about Hegel, but I don't want to remove it because I don't know enough about Danto say whether or not it is accurate about Danto: "...But he thinks that a certain history of western art has come to an end, in about the way that Hegel suggested it would." ...Hegel didn't suggest that art "would" eventually come to an end. He thought that art already was a thing of the past. Even in his own time, Hegel believed that art was no longer capable of having the same meaning for moderns as it did for the Greeks. According to Hegel art had already ended with the decline of the Greeks. Brijohn6882 (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2013 (UTC)