From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Asaram Bapu/Comments)
Jump to: navigation, search

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

The controversies show biased nature of the article.[edit]

The article needs to have the other side too. To the sexual assault case the Bholanand has himself confessed that the allegations are false and part of controversies against bapu.

Also one must throw light on exact details of ashram's clean chit on land grabbing issue, tantrik issue etc.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 03:04, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

You should provide reliable sources to get these things into the article. --Enric Naval (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

This very true as there are many video on YouTube. Also there is been no evidence since 3 and a half years Shobhit.dalal (talk) 18:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Clean Chits[edit]

CID ISSUES CLEAN CHIT TO SANT ASARAMJI ASHRAM ABOUT BLACK MAGIC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohan.rick (talkcontribs) 05:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 August 2014[edit]

Please remove content "sections 342 (wrongful confinement), 376 (rape), 506 (criminal intimidation)" as these allegations not proved yet. Neharun144 (talk) 07:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. Article merely states what the source says the police booked subject under. Sam Sing! 08:00, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 September 2014[edit]

The info that u people had put is all false, your source of info is newspaper and newspaper who never shows true news for bapu ji. So please remove the info requested or remove this page. 2401:A100:C000:2CB3:68DF:88D5:274B:A01C (talk) 05:00, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Not done Wikipedia relies on reliable sources. If a specific comment or source is unreliable, you need to explain how and why. Simply removing material because you find it objectionable is not an acceptable solution. Grayfell (talk) 05:15, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 January 2015[edit]


name change not possible per WP:HONORIFIC --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 12:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 February 2015[edit] (talk) 18:40, 5 February 2015 (UTC) Put " Sant " infront of this great person's name. Thank you.

Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 19:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2015[edit] (talk) 18:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Undue weight[edit]

The excessive detail about the alleged threats is WP:COATRACKing at its worst, particularly the gratuitous table format presentation. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

pinging Utcursch who expanded this article and added this. ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 12:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
IMO, I think the entire table should be trimmed to a single statement. Same goes with the section death case above it. This is just too much coverage given. NOTNEWS. ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:39, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Asaram/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Substituted at 21:34, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Asaram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Regarding Page deletion[edit]

Page will not be deleted for the time being , although it is seriously in violation of WP:Biography of living person , cause rewriting the page is difficult now.Cleanup has been initiated--Uddalak Aruni (talk) 17:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Page move from Asaram to Sant Sri Asaram Bapuji[edit]

@Vigyani (talk · contribs) and Admin Bishonen (talk · contribs) Titodutta (talk · contribs) or other admin. Someone moved page to honorifc title. As I am not an admin cannot undo move. Pl some admin restore page to old title. Jethwarp (talk) 12:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

That move violated several Wikipedia policies. Moved back. Thank you, Jethwarp. Bishonen | talk 13:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC).

Vigilance against misinformation[edit]

A user "Getting41" had inserted these into the article on 11 Sept- "In September 2014 girl said on camera That pressure for wrong allegations on her" and "Girls birth certificate shown that she is 18 year and 10 day old on the allege date 16 August 2013." Citing propagandist websites. And also provided misinformation regarding medical examination results, citing an "alternate platform". That these remained unnoticed on the page for over a month despite the first two additions clearly standing apart from rest regarding grammar and spelling is a cause of concern. ToMt (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Parents' Worship Day Article recreated[edit]

Parents' Worship Day was recreated recently. I know that it had previously been merged into this article. The content there does not reflect the section on the same subject here in this article. Any interested editors here should probably look into that article as well. I happened upon it after reading ANI. Researching the references provided, I feel like that article insufficiently provides context for the right-wing nationalist Hindu context in which the holiday is being promoted. --Klaun (talk) 16:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Deleted content that was sourced has been restored[edit]

I restored some content that was deleted from the article regarding sexual assault allegations. I could not understand the reason provided in the summary for why the content was deleted. Let's discuss the propsed changes here. --Klaun (talk) 21:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Acquittal in Threats and attacks case[edit]

He was acquitted in threats and attacks case by Additional District Judge Court(ADJ court).[1][2] Serene me (talk) 16:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)