Talk:Aspect weaver

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Aspect weaver has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
February 1, 2010 Peer review Reviewed
February 18, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 16, 2010.
Current status: Good article

Incomplete sentence[edit]

The sentence "While traditional optimizations such as the elimination of unused special variables from aspect code can be done during compile-time, some optimizations." Not sure what was intended here. decltype (talk) 07:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Uh... I'm not sure what happened. I remember that sentence (in full). Either I didn't finish what I was writing or it got removed. I'll see if I can find it in the history. Thanks for pointing that out! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 16:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Found it. I incorrectly chopped up a sentence here. Thanks again! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 16:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Ah, I see. decltype (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Problem with definition[edit]

"The advice specifies the exact location and functionality of the injected code." IMHO: "The advice specifies the functionality of the injected code." - it is correct, and "Point cuts specifie exact locations of the injected code." 83.222.41.113 (talk) 16:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aspect weaver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)