This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.aamc.org/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original orplagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Drchriswilliams (talk) 06:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, the simplest way forward here would appear to be to revert the article to a version before the sequence of edits on 3 November text which have introduced sections of text that were lifted directly from the AAMC website. Drchriswilliams (talk) 20:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
How do I fix this? The information is directly from the AAMC website. I am using information that is facts from the main source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zltm8693 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
@Zltm8693: The problem is that you are using wording that is almost an exact match to the wording in the website. Even though a few words a different, this type of writing, known as close paraphrase is an infringement of their copyright. Since Wikipedia cannot use copyright material, this cannot remain in the article. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
@Zltm8693: As per the suggestion by Bluerasberry (in the section above), I have reverted the article to before all of the edits that occurred recently. This means that is possible for anyone to begin to add material to the page again. Please take this opportunity to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia:Copyrights and do not continue to lift whole sections of material from other websites. Drchriswilliams (talk) 22:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)