Talk:Assume the Position with Mr. Wuhl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Stub, really?[edit]

The description has enough detail that a stub was highly unwarranted.—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 01:30, April 5, 2011

Please review WP:STUB. This article is well within the definition. In addition, your consistent removal of stub template from numerous articles without explanation may be considered as disruptive. elektrikSHOOS 02:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello, different person here. I've read through the above link on stubs as well as the linked Croughton-London rule. It is my opinion that this is not, under the Croughton-London rule, a stub as there simply isn't much more that can be said about this topic. If any sort of decision is in consideration, I think that the stub tags should be remove on those grounds.—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:53, May 1, 2013