Talk:Atmospheric chemistry observational databases

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am slowly adding links to the data repositories for these datasets and the relevant wikipedia articles. Dlary 14:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Observational Database[edit]

A large observational database of many different atmospheric constituents from a host of platforms is available. This was created as part of ESA Envisat and NASA Aura validation. It is of general use. Do you think it should be added to the article text? Dlary 03:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea! Mkfwd 02:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the Cambridge Atmospheric Chemical Database is better as an external link. Freewikidata 02:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other Instruments[edit]

Sections are needed on other instruments such as GOME on ERS-2 and the suite of Envisat instruments. Freewikidata 03:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would also be good to have info/links to meteorological data on temperature and winds and also rawinsondes. Mkfwd 03:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, a comprehensive set of links would be useful. Actw 06:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The key point is that the instruments mentioned should give free access to their data. Dlary 03:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Atmospheric chemistry observational databases. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Atmospheric chemistry observational databases. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scope, additional entries[edit]

This has already been mentioned, but there are an overwhelming number of atmospheric chemistry observations that this article misses. Off the top of my head: (ground based) TCCON, the NOAA/ESRL surface network, (satellite based) SCIAMACHY, AIRS, MOPITT, IASI, GOSAT, OCO-2. There is also NOAA's ObsPack which is an integrated collection of measurements of carbon species. I believe GAW produces a similar product.

The aircraft section does a good job of linking to NASA's EVS because there are a ton of campaigns.

I could go about adding a lot of these, but I think the article would get really messy. So my question is what should the scope of this article be? Should it focus on all measurements? Just database collections? Should there be some sort of table for different measurements instead of paragraph-long text-based descriptions?

briardew (talk) 15:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]