Talk:Atom (system on a chip)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Misc[edit]

Should this page be renamed to Medfield? The three skus mentioned are all medfield. The medfield link on the main Atom page leads here. Dagnir85 (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My edit which fixed some grammical errors as well as removed some sourceless assertions was rolled back by the original poster. Dagnir85 (talk) 21:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's a redirect in place from Medfield (system on chip), left after the move. -- Trevj (talk) 12:01, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Exynos 4 is currently (Q2 2012) 32nm (keeping up with Atom) and Snapdragon S4 is 28nm so Intel does not have a competitive advantage in this respect. Consider changing the "stay one step ahead in semiconductor technology" comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.68.48.11 (talk) 10:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Table[edit]

  1. split the table into two: x86 and x86-64 instruction set so we can remove this from the table and also mention all the supported extensions (MMX, etc.)
  2. remove the marketing names for models and platforms and what not, they are only misleading
  3. we should mention, that some SoCs contain an LTE modem from intel

highly biased market info[edit]

Saying that the Open community is dedicated to asian SoC chips with copyright payments to (england ARM is made in asia, trying to overthrow intel), or that OpenSource avoids OpenGL and Java copyrights: absolutely rediculous.

Intel powered most of the OpenSource efforot and made HEAVY donations to it. Infact many euorpeans "data centers" are composed of intel exports to their country and allot of USA software they copied and put their names on.

One can certainly promote ARM I'll promote Intel. However saying the "linux bsd" community hates Intel is simply a lie anyone who's been around for more than a few years is going to call you out on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.209.223.190 (talk) 19:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

more bias[edit]

Also many of these asian / euro SoC boards, names of which aside, are base on the Intel SoC reference boards. These are full designs Intel gave away for FREE to promote sales of SoC and other small electronic gadgets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.209.223.190 (talk) 19:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Atom (system on chip). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Atom (system on chip). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information on Intel® Pentium® Processor N3540 is missing[edit]

Considering this: https://ark.intel.com/products/82105/Intel-Pentium-Processor-N3540-2M-Cache-up-to-2_66-GHz, I would think that the N3540 would belong here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.247.240.203 (talk) 13:23, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Atom (system on chip). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atom_(system_on_a_chip)&oldid=1199161351"