Talk:Automatic switched-transport network
Well I think it may be interesting to distinguish between ASTN and GMPLS because ASTN is an architecture and GMPLS a set of protocol, moreover they depend on different standard bodies...
Definitely agree. GMPLS isn't necessarily optical, or at least is agnostic to it if it is passing either time slot information or cross-connect port information. Howard C. Berkowitz 13:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
I second the proposal. There should be separate pages for ASTN and GMPLS, as the article is saying that they are not identical.
The division between the two pages would be at the second paragraph: GMPLS consists of several protocols...
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Automatic switched-transport network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721080440/http://www.itea2.org/public/documents/TBONES_demonstration.pdf to http://www.itea2.org/public/documents/TBONES_demonstration.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.