Talk:Babaria

India: Gujarat Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Ethnic groups Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Arbitrary heading[edit]

I had created the page and have cited relevant references of almost all the statements made in article from reliable sources like noted historians, gazetteers and noted by census of India. As such I am removing the tags like neutrality is disputed, factual accuracy is disputed, weasel words, conflict of interest, etc. which have been put by some editor at his personal whim. If some one wants to put back those tags, he should give logical reasons for doing so. Jethwarp (talk) 06:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Babariya[edit]

I am seeing some sources that refer to the Babaria and the Babariya, which seem to be in the same region. It is the latter spelling that mentions the connection with the Kathi. We did have an article at Babariya that was redirected to Kathi Darbar and contained a paragraph currently in this article.

Thus, I'm becoming confused. Is Babariya an alternate spelling for Babaria or is it another community from the same region? Note that this source uses both spellings. Any ideas, Jethwarp? - Sitush (talk) 05:12, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Sitush, long time, how is u & ur health?

As far a I am aware Babariya amd Babaria are one and same, so it would be better if Babariya is redirected to Babaria. Regards.Jethwarp (talk) 04:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Up and down, I'm afraid, but thanks for asking. I think you are right but will leave it a few days in case anyone else wants to comment. - Sitush (talk) 11:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pl do take care of ur health. Best wishes. I don't think there will be anymore comments. Jethwarp (talk) 06:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Bawariya[edit]

Bawariya is another article that appears in all likelihood to be about the same group. It seems to be less reliably sourced, but it's the older of the two. – Uanfala (talk) 02:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]