Talk:Babel One

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Babel One has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star Babel One is part of the Star Trek: Enterprise (season 4) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
January 27, 2014 Good article nominee Listed
May 25, 2016 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Television / Episode coverage (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of television on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the episode coverage task force.
 
WikiProject Star Trek (Rated GA-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Re-worded[edit]

I re worded the plot outline for the episode, since the first words were 'The Romulans attack...' and it was kind of a spoiler (which I know doesn't go against wiki policy) but it was also not in chronological order, and it was very short, I added a little detail to it. Tydamann (talk) 12:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Babel One/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 22:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

I was about to review this before, but then you withdrew it, so now it's back, and I'm not missing my chance! Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to review it. The only major change I did to it was to expand the reception section (using the same two reviews), but in the meanwhile they also annouced the publication date of the season four Blu-Ray, so I added that as well. Miyagawa (talk) 13:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

OK, here goes:

  • The guest star thing in the infobox lists a few who aren't mentioned in the article elsewhere. Consider noting their appearance in the Production section.
  • What I normally do is to cite the guest star list in the infobox - for some reason although my browser says that I opened the Radio Times site for this episode before, I never added the cite. I also removed one of the actors from the list as it wasn't included in the source. Miyagawa (talk) 17:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
  • "Filming ran on a seven-day schedule, which started on November 2, 2004 and ran until November 10th." Couldn't this just be shortened to "Filming began on November 2, 2004 and lasted until November 10."?
  • Much better! Changed as suggested. Miyagawa (talk) 17:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
  • "Jamahl Epsicokhan at his website Jammer's Reviews," drop the comma
  • Blu ray should be Blu-ray
  • "The Blu ray release of the final season of Enterprise is due on April 1, 2014.[8]" you haven't specified the fourth season is the final - could potentially be confusing
  • Changed to fourth season. Miyagawa (talk) 17:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 00:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC)`

  • Going to have to hold up my hand and admit a mistake, mainly because I've fixed it now. I got Lee Arenberg mixed up with Aron Eisenberg. I had said that Arenberg played Nog, but it was actually Eisenberg. Arenberg played a bunch of other Ferengi as supported by the source (and I've now changed to reflect the source). I must have read Ferengi and Arenberg and thought Eisenberg. But it's all sorted now. Miyagawa (talk) 17:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Since the concerns are addressed I'm passing this. Stepping in since Taylor noted in another review that his connection/activity has been iffy of late. Wizardman 04:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)