Talk:Back to Basics (Christina Aguilera album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Back to Basics (Christina Aguilera album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
May 4, 2013 Good article nominee Listed
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Christina Aguilera (Rated GA-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christina Aguilera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christina Aguilera on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

This article has comments here.

WikiProject Albums (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

This article has comments here.

WikiProject Pop music (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject R&B and Soul Music (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

This article has comments here.

This article has an assessment summary page.

Lotus is the fifth, Back To Basics is the third.[edit]

Again, there is a difference between studio albums and albums recorded in a studio (or every album would be a studio album, except for live ones) [1] Ã — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.37.233.75 (talk) 21:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Requested moves[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Clear primary topic – when you type in "Back t-", this is the first suggestion after the Back to the Future films and Back to Black. Unreal7 (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment: I think there was a mistake in the nominator's suggestion here, so I edited it accordingly. I'm not expressing support or opposition at this time. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose. I don't see this being the primary topic for "Back to Basics". ONR (talk) 00:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose - per WP:SONGDAB - User:BarrelProof, can we say don't do primary topics for multiple albums?, cf Back to Basics (Alan Hull album), 1994 Back to Basics (Anvil album), 2004, Back to Basics (Beenie Man album), 2004 Back to Basics (Billy Bragg album), 1987 Back to Basics (Maze album), 1993 In ictu oculi (talk) 03:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose per WP:SONGDAB which states if there are two or more albums etc with the same name... --Richhoncho (talk) 14:20, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Since the popularity of music tends to be volatile and temporary, we should be very conservative about assigning WP:PRIMARYTOPIC status to particular songs or albums. This seems especially true of works produced within the most recent couple of decades, and here we have a work that is only eight years old being considered in relation to several prior works by other highly notable major artists (e.g., here we have Olivia Newton-John, Billy Bragg, The Temptations, and Maze). Also, very little evidence of primary topic status was provided – just the behavior of some unidentified autocomplete suggestion algorithm, which says nothing about long-term significance or the ratio of searches for one topic versus another. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose. No clear primary topic. I think most British people old enough to remember it, for example, would think of the political campaign. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:13, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose per WP:SONGDAB guidelines and above comments. IPadPerson (talk) 00:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

For expansion[edit]

Simon (talk) 03:02, 19 December 2014 (UTC)