Talk:Baclayon Church/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 00:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- I see one {{clarification needed}} tag in the lead.
- Clarified. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- The Manual of Style suggests the lead should be two paragraphs. The last sentence by itself can probably be merged into the preceding paragraph.
- Done. Merged. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- The two one-sentence paragraphs in the history section should probably be merged into the preceding paragraphs, if logical.
- Done. Merged. I think it is logical --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Regarding the headings, is "Retablo" supposed to be capitalized? It's set in lowercase in the body and captions.
- Noted, changes done. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Some redundant in-line citations can probably be eliminated (i.e., remove references from the end of consecutive sentences if they're the same reference number).
- Noted, changes done. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Toolbox tools turned up nothin' major, so that's good.
Nice work for a beautiful church; sad about the earthquake. ;( On hold for two weeks. 23W 00:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- @23W:, Please see my reply after each comments. Thanks. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi @23W:, you might want to review the nomination. Thanks. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Carlojoseph14: Sorry for the wait! I've been tremendously busy, but I'll have a follow-up soon. 23W 23:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi @23W:, you might want to review the nomination. Thanks. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Carlojoseph14:
Changes look good. I've made the following revisions here; they mostly involve grammar and minor MOS things. (Finally) passing this now; thank you for being patient with me over this month! 23W 22:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)