Jump to content

Talk:Bamunara, Purba Bardhaman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 4 May 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved Bamunara VillageBamunara, Purba Bardhaman, and BamunaraBamunara, Paschim Bardhaman per 162 etc. Dab page created at the base title. No such user (talk) 13:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Bamunara VillageBamunara (village) – "village" seems to be a disambiguator rather than an actual part of the name, so I suggest this be renamed per Wikipedia's disambiguation conventions. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
12:56, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This would not follow established precedent with other articles at Category:Cities and towns in Paschim Bardhaman district and Category:Cities and towns in Purba Bardhaman district. 162 etc. (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I believe district should be suffixed to be in-line with the main article and category. Although there no towns/cities named Purba Bardhaman, generally districts in India are named after eponymous towns. So a village (or town) would be a part of that district, but not the town its named after. -- Ab207 (talk) 18:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you can bring it up at Wikipedia:WikiProject India. Your point is a valid one, although I believe leaving out "district" to keep the title concise is the best way to go. 162 etc. (talk) 00:48, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Likewise. If that proposed naming convention gets consensus support, fine, but I'm skeptical that it will. The term district is necessary in those article titles, but not in the disambiguators as district is implied there. Andrewa (talk) 08:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.