Talk:Bank of America Roval 400

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Bank of America 500)

Opening heading[edit]

I hope that the image is a good one. That's the best photos that I have from that race. The other photos are of individual cars. I have some other shots from the 2003 race, too. --edgester July 6, 2005 01:30 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BankAm-500.jpg[edit]

Image:BankAm-500.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: already moved Peter Karlsen (talk) 23:33, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


NASCAR Banking 500 → Bank of America 500 — They've changed the name back to Bank of America 500, it would seem. Khan_singh (talk) 06:47, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

  • Oppose. I would support a move to a name based on Wikipedia's official article naming polcy, but there's no evidence offered above that this proposal is to move to the correct name, in fact it seems unlikely, see comments below. Andrewa (talk) 14:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Weak support (change of vote). There seems no case for the current name, and we haven't come up with a better one than this proposal despite much effort in discussion below. It's an improvement, so let's move on. Andrewa (talk) 23:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. In conformity to the precedent of using the official name as the title for every Sprint Cup Series race, and to distinguish this race more clearly from the Coca-Cola 600, held at Charlotte Motor Speedway on Memorial Day weekend. Khan_singh (talk) 04:36, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

This article has already been renamed several times, apparently without discussion, reflecting the sponsor's official name for the event. While of course the sponsor would like to think that the common name changed every time the official name was changed, in practice it's unlikely, and the onus of proof is on those who wish to rename the article that this is the case.

Another problem with changing the name as proposed is that the article isn't just about this year's race, it's about all the Sprint Cup Series races conducted at Charlotte Motor Speedway starting in 1960, when the race wasn't even 500 miles long.

So a rename is probably needed, but probably not this one. Google isn't much help in finding the right name, see [1] [2] [3] and compare to [4]. Suggestions? Andrewa (talk) 14:24, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I was going by the NASCAR schedule [5]. Maybe the appropriate course would be to rename each NASCAR race according to its location and distance, and note its current sponsor's name in the introduction? In this model, you might use names like Charlotte 500, or Bristol 500 (Spring) and Bristol 500 (Summer) for tracks that host two races. There is precedent for this with stadiums in Australia and New Zealand that are still located at their original names, e.g. ANZ Stadium is at Stadium Australia while AMI Stadium is at Lancaster Park. Admittedly, that's kind of a thin parallel. Khan_singh (talk) 03:06, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Have you read and tried to understand the policy? Suggestions that ignore it are frankly a waste of time, and I'm afraid those above sound very much like they fit into that category.
The parallel is indeed thin; The precedents you claim are named in that way because this is the common name, and so far as I can see they aren't precedents for what you are proposing at all.
Hang in there, I agree something needs to happen. I just need to warn you that creating new and original article naming conventions is generally seen as rather un-Wikipedian, and support is unlkely. Have a go if you like, but keep your sense of humour handy. Andrewa (talk) 18:28, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa, hold it a second. I was just thinking out loud. I agree that the common name is always to be preferred. While we're on the subject, what do people usually call this race? Don't they call it the Bank of America 500? Khan_singh (talk) 02:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And what do you know. Someone moved it back to Bank of America 500 while we were discussing it. Heh. Khan_singh (talk) 02:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By cut and paste unfortunately, and by a repeat offender previously blocked for such actions. Reverted, see User talk:Gaeaman787#Still another Cut/Paste move. Andrewa (talk) 19:47, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that. The race title is the Bank of America 500 for this year, not the NASCAR Banking 500. That's why I moved it. You can check the 2010 schedule for the official name. MAy I ask why you actually moved it to the old title? Gaeaman787 (talk) 21:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mind. I thought we should move it to Bank of America 500, but when I tried, the history of changes at that location prevented it. That's why I requested the move. Andrewa raises an interesting point, I think. If the sponsor name is going to change from year to year, should we move simply move it every time? The Qantas Australian Grand Prix is still located at Australian Grand Prix. But if we're not going to use the name that appears on NASCAR's own schedule, what do we use? Do we just call it Charlotte like ESPN would? Khan_singh (talk) 02:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever we use, it should be the common name. See Bathurst 1000 for one answer to a similar dilemma, but it may not be the right answer for this article. See also WP:NC which is Wikipedia official policy and Wikipedia:official names which is an essay intended to explain some relevant aspects of the policy. Andrewa (talk) 11:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've done some checking, but I can't find a better name than Bank of America 500. Many sources continued to use that name even when it was officially NASCAR Banking &c. Most fans just call the race Charlotte, but that's no different than the Irwin Tools Night Race, which everyone calls the Bristol night race. It would be one thing if Bank of America had sponsored the Daytona 500, but there doesn't seem to be any traditional name associated with this race. Again, in absence of a better alternative, my suggestion is to move this to Bank of America 500. Khan_singh (talk) 23:23, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hold on... exactly what do most fans call it? Charlotte? Charlotte 500? This needs more investigation. See [6] [7] and I notice that the second gets far more hits than the first. But the other question is, is the second name accurate in terms of WP:NC? I'd argue it's not; It refers only to the years in which this particular sponsorship deal was in place, the article is about all years, not just the recent ones that tend to dominate the Google results. Andrewa (talk) 01:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ha. This is what we call the "Curious Case of Rival Search Engines." When I searched "Charlotte 500" on Yahoo, the top results pointed me to something along the lines of Bank of America 500 at Charlotte. I don't have any results to back this, but in my experience on message boards and in conversation, fans mostly refer to the races by their locations, e.g. Talladega instead of Amp Energy Juice 500, Richmond instead of Air Guard 400, &c. In truth, I bet most NASCAR fans don't know the official name of every race; they're so accustomed to knowing each race by its track. The names change so often due to sponsorship, people may not have a chance to grow familiar with them, so it's easier to use the name of the track. I just don't think Charlotte (Sprint Cup race) would be a particularly appropriate title.
As to your other question, I would just point out that the Sprint Cup Series refers to the top flight of stock racing - including its history since 1949 - not just the series since 2008. Khan_singh (talk) 05:38, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it gets a bit complicated. The Bathurst 1000 article similarly covers a race that was IMO most famous as the Hardie Ferodo 500. With this precedent I tend to favour Charlotte 500 as a name for this article, but that might be puting an Australian perspective on an American event. Still thinking and listening. Andrewa (talk) 07:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My point here is that there's no name of this race that held so much currency with fans that they clung to it even after the sponsorship was sold. I imagine if it had a distinctive name like the Charlotte Sweepstakes or if it were a more prestigious race like the Daytona 500 that that would be the case. And so we've come full circle. The sponsored name appears on the official schedule, there's no name particular to the race that fans use in common parlance, and the name they do use would be too ambiguous for a title. I've looked at it every way I can think of, but all things considered, Bank of America 500 is the best possible title.
For what it's worth, I only proposed Charlotte 500 because, when Homestead-Miami Speedway was removed from the IndyCar Series in 2011 and beyond, I moved the Cafes do Brasil Indy 300 to Homestead–Miami Indy 300. The name had changed so often due to sponsorship and there was no name that was most associated with the race, so the generic name was best, in my opinion. Khan_singh (talk) 00:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If Bank of America 500 meets the rules then by all means we should use it, but the case you're making doesn't seem to even acknowledge that these rules exist. They do exist, and they represent a great deal of work, and they'll save us a great deal of work if we follow them.
The main question remaining in my mind is whether Bank of America 500 is better than Charlotte 500. Both seem to satisfy the requirements. Here's a hypothetical question that might help: If the sponsorship was withdrawn and the official name changed to something completely different, would the race still be commonly referred to as the Bank of America 500 (in some senses wrongly)? If not, then that's cause to question whether the name is really well enough established to be a good article name. Andrewa (talk) 05:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, it's not commonly used by race fans now. Journalists use it. ESPN, which produces the broadcast that airs on ABC, only uses it because Bank of America pays an advertising premium. Otherwise, they would call it the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series at Charlotte, because they only use the sponsored name on air if the price is right. But again, the name that is in common use among fans is simply Charlotte. Do you think that that's an appropriate title for this article? Really, I think we're expending way too much thought on this. Yes, Bank of America 500 is a better name than Charlotte 500. Every other Sprint Cup race article uses the official name, even if the fans seldom do. I think this one should conform to that pattern. Khan_singh (talk) 04:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It finally just occured to me that we have to us the official name in order to more clearly distiguish this race from the race held at this track in the Spring, the Coca-Cola 600. Khan_singh (talk) 04:34, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your cut-and-paste move needed to be reversed to restore the page history, and the faster this was done the easier it was going to be to do it. Please do not perform cut-and-paste moves. You have been blocked once for this already. Please also allow this discussion to complete before moving the article. Andrewa (talk) 11:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, it wouldn't be fair to mislead fans on the name of the race, and other races names are changed every year on different pages. So, I think for the sake of accuracy and honesty, we should move it to Bank of America 500.Gaeaman787 (talk) 12:58, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest you read Wikipedia:official names, which describes this view exactly, and tries to explain how and why it is contrary to the official Wikipedia policy on article names. That's not to say that this isn't the best name, it's just saying that your rationale above is completely contrary to well established practice here.
What we need to find out is what people commonly do call it. If this isn't the "correct" name, Wikipedia is not in the business of correcting them. Or at least that's been the policy to date, and I doubt you will succeed in changing it. You are of course at liberty to try, and you wouldn't be the first to do so.
We are of course in the business of informing them of the correct and official names, and this information goes into the article content. But as far as the article name is concerned, we follow whatever the common practice is.
And we have redirects from other names, and particularly from offical names, scholarly names, names used by fans and experts and other minority groups where these differ from the common names.
Can you give examples of other races names that are changed every year on different pages? Andrewa (talk) 19:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at alot of the Nationwide Series & Truck Series race pages. Their sponsors change alot year by year. Example would be the CarQuest 300 (Nationwide), Smith's Las Vegas 350 (Trucks). Considering that alot of sources (tickets, promoters, tv advertisments, official race records) call this race the Bank of America 500 and not the NASCAR Banking 500. But is the established practice to call it the NASCAR Banking 500? Because the sponsor has remained constant in Bank of America, only the actual name has changed. So, if its 2 years from now and the name of the race is something like, NASCAR Banking Credit 500 presented by Bank of America are we still going to leave it as the NASCAR Banking 500. Because personally I don't think it is the common naming convention. Gaeaman787 (talk) 21:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please can you provide a specific page that is an example of other races names that are changed every year on different pages? Andrewa (talk) 01:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bank of America 500. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:23, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bank of America 500. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article be split into separate articles on the former oval race and the current road course race?[edit]

It seems fairly confusing and unintuitive to have one article cover two substantially different events just because they happen to take place at the same location. 2A02:C7F:DC08:9000:514F:3A7:8D8D:C406 (talk) 20:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My feeling exactly
Th Roval race started in 2018 . Every oval race prior is a different event.
If they were the same event then you could easily compare times which would be ludicrous given the two different layouts and obviously car setups 67.83.148.129 (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"List of NASCAR Banking 500 Only from Bank of America broadcasters" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect List of NASCAR Banking 500 Only from Bank of America broadcasters has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 5 § List of NASCAR Banking 500 Only from Bank of America broadcasters until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 00:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bank_of_America_Roval_400&oldid=1199476254"