What does it mean in Purpose and scope: ″ because it considers more 'as or more extreme' tables by not conditioning on both margins.″? Should one delete the first 'more'? Xenonice (talk) 06:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm very short on time right now and don't yet understand how to add external links in references... But I thought I should mention that I've found one of the papers mentioned in the references, which does not now have an external link: "Conditional versus Unconditional Exact Tests for Comparing Two Binomials" is at http://www.cytel.com/Papers/twobinomials.pdf. If someone who knows how wants to add it, great.
Last edited at 17:02, 4 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 01:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
The section on criticisms should contain criticisms of *Barnard's* test. It doesn't seem to contain any -- it seems it's just criticisms of Fisher's test (which belong elsewhere). Where's Barnard's own criticisms of unconditional tests in comparison with conditional tests for example? Indeed most of the article is tendentious rather than impartial/neutral. The claim that Barnard's test is preferred by "most researchers" is likely to be false. I've marked it as citation needed -- if none if forthcoming, that claim should be removed. Glenbarnett (talk) 09:23, 22 August 2017 (UTC)