Talk:Basilica of St. Lawrence, Asheville

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mar 17th addtions by 75.131.165.222[edit]

I'm concerned the Mar 17th addtions by 75.131.165.222 might be copyright violating. There's a large number of missing spaces between common words that might indicate OCR being used on printed material. Jason Quinn 14:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The bulk of this article (about 80%) is a word-for-word copy of this page. ++Arx Fortis 04:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the article. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:54, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Needs improvement[edit]

This article has lots of good pictures, but it needs some serious improvement. There is not enough information on the actual basilica. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:18, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added a lot of information found on the basilica's website about the enterior of the church. If anyone has any information about the history of the basilica, please add it to the article. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 20:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Basilica of St. Lawrence, Asheville. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]