|Battle axe has been listed as a level-4 vital article in Technology. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as Start-Class.|
Where on earth did that funky picture come from? Can't someone find a photo of the real things?
"No historical examples of North European double headed axes exist (in the eastern Mediterrean the Labrys was known), though they are ubiquitous to fantasy and fiction writings and movies."
"Battle axes sometimes had two heads (one on each side) or a spike on the top and the opposite side of the blade."
can anyone clarify?
- The double headed axe is mainly a product of modern fantasy mythology. They would have been much too heavy and unwieldy to be practical, and certainly could not be thrown as well as a Frankish axe. The Labrys appears to be more of a religious item than a military weapon. The association of the Labrys with Lesbians is unfortunate, mainly because was largely a religious ceremonial item. But then, perhaps a Homer expert knows better.Scott Adler 13:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
This article seems to be settling down, but was originally subject to some radical changes, and was never written in a cohesive way, rather several authors added a line or two, often contraticing from one line to the next. Several highly questionable statements (axes weighing 30+ lbs, et al)were removed a bit at a time. Some popped back up and were redacted. This article needs an in depth overhaul by one qualified author.
Why no mention of the Franks?
The Franks were the only nation to specialize specifically in the battle axe rather than the sword and spear combination. Why are they omitted?Scott Adler 13:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Don't get me wrong, I think the lovely lady with the axe is very pretty, I just don't like seeing movie ads on pages which are not related. Can someone bust out the tuxpaint and make a battle axe picture?
Stone axes have been in use since at least the 3rd millennium BC, see Battle-axe people (see also Mjollnir).
I am deleting the link to Mjollnir, as it is unrelated to this article (Mjollnir was a hammer, not an axe, and you can see so yourself on the article: Mjollnir)
--Loki Laufeyson 02:32, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
This article looks like it's the beginnings of an overview, but I'd really like to see more detail: average lengths and weights of typical axes would be wonderful, as well as usage styles (one handed/two handed). I'm just thirsting for more details. The article on the Dane axe is good, but why is there nothing about anything for 1-handed battle axes (as the picture appears to be of)? The Jade Knight (talk) 07:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
The opening picture, that of Pier Gerlofs Donia with his "axe", does not depict what most battle axes look like. I don't think the weapon he is holding even exists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 19:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- The weapon Donia holds in the image is 'NOT' a battle axe, it is a ploughshare. The picture illustrates a well-known story about Donia killing Dutch mercenaries with his plough (which is seen in the background). The image has therefore no place on a page about battle axes. I replaced it with the earlier image of real battle axes.Paaskynen (talk)
Apparent Typo in top entry ...
... Axes designed for warfare ranged ... such as the Danish axe or the sparth axe. Anytime longer than 4000.5 m [I would think this should read "Anything longer than 1.5 m"] ... would arguably fall more into the category of polearms. Jornadigan (talk) 18:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Battle Axe used as an insult
Would someone please comment on how this term became coined as an insult, namely "old battle axe." I've heard it used a couple of times recently and am wondering if it simply refers to age (as in someone very old) or has a more significant meaning.22.214.171.124 (talk) 04:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)John Anderson, CT.
From the into:
They produced several varieties, including..."bearded" axes...and "skeg" axes...
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle axe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141011210239/http://traditionalfilipinoweapons.com/Panabas.htm to http://traditionalfilipinoweapons.com/Panabas.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.