Talk:Battle of Bréville

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Battle of Bréville has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
November 20, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Military history (Rated GA-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality assessment scale.

Copyedit feedback[edit]

Phil asked for feedback on the copyedit, so I'm putting it here.

Overall it looks great, but here are a few minor things to note.

  • "After the capture of Bréville, the Germans never seriously attempted to break through the airborne division's lines again. After the attack," ... two consecutive sentences starting with the same construction and meaning sounds awkward.
  • "simultaneously destroying the Merville gun battery" ... simultaneously is a very specific word, much more so than the at the same time of the original, and you've also made it apply to the entire sentence here, which it didn't before. The Orne and Caen bridges were to be seized within minutes of the gliders landing, just after midnight, but the force tasked to destroy the battery had until 5:30am to do so, thus spending several hours regrouping and marching in between. I would suggest it's better to say nothing about timing at all, but simply to list the initial objectives. (This is similar to the first bullet point in Wikipedia:Checklist; if an aspect isn't being discussed, whether causation or timing or anything else, and if the sentence is clearly understandable without it, then just don't mention it.)
  • "The village could be used by the Germans as a location to build up forces. As it was almost on a direct line crossing the DZ, where the British paratroopers and gliders had landed, to Ranville at the heart of the British position and beyond to the River Orne bridge." ... this pair of sentences needed more attention than you gave them, particularly in how they relate to each other. (A sentence should make sense as an independent unit; the second of these doesn't.)
Changed wording Jim Sweeney (talk) 20:46, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • "Two infantry companies attacked 'B' Company 9th Parachute Battalions position." ... definitely needs an apostrophe.
  • "This attack was more determined and even naval gunfire support from the 6 inch (150 mm) guns of HMS Arethusa did not stop the attack and they reached the company's lines." ... sentence needs a bit of a re-write to deal with the "and...and" structure, repetition of "attack", and "they" becoming a new subject in the last few words.
  • 'who informed them "his regiment had been destroyed in the fighting"' ... this needs to be made either direct speech or reported speech, not a mixture of both. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
All rectified Jim Sweeney (talk) 20:58, 3 November 2011 (UTC)