Talk:Battle of Civitate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Latin[edit]

There is a lot of Latin in this article, can we get some of it translated into English so it's readable by anybody? Awiseman 22:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, all the Latin sentences are translated. What are you refering to?--Panairjdde 16:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Semper gens normannica prona est ad avaritiam, militariter lucrum quaerens, dux Italiae, vexllum sancti Petri. I think the phrases are somewhat unneccessary, and should at least be translated if not removed. Awiseman 15:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Normans were famous for being always greedy" <=> Semper gens normannica prona est ad avaritiam
  • militariter lucrum quaerens <=> "looking for their payback with the military service"
  • dux Italiae is a title, like shogun, zar, imperator, and so on
  • vexllum sancti Petri is, as stated in the article, simply the name of the papal standard, just like Union Jack is the name of the UK flag.
If the problem is solved, would you please remove the tag?--Panairjdde 23:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, vexillum and dux are fine (I added brief clarifications), but the other two phrases still seem extraneous, unless they are quotes from someone. Who said them? Otherwise it's just saying the same thing twice - saying they were mercenaries, then saying it in Latin, and saying they were greedy, then saying it in Latin. Awiseman 14:01, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously it is a cititation, from the "Sources", Goffredo Malaterra (De rebus gestis Rogerii Calabriae et Siciliae comitis et Roberti Guiscardi ducis fratris eius, which is in Latin), and William of Apulia (Gesta Roberti Wiscardi, again in Latin). However, if you can't bear these citations, it's better to remove them. (Note it is quite funny that the tag says "The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view", but the point is removing an original text which is not in English)--Panairjdde 22:55, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Then please put a footnote on whichever phrase was from which book. The tag was the closest I could get Awiseman 17:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have no time. I reverted my edit. Save what you see good. Bye.--Panairjdde 19:50, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fine Awiseman 19:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added globalize tag[edit]

I added the {globalize} tag because it seemed closest to problem I have with the article, that it has a lot of Latin, which makes it hard for people not fluent in Latin (i.e. most people) to follow some sections. Awiseman 21:54, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

X[edit]

Constantine IX was the Byzantine ruler at the time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.182.53.175 (talk) 22:25, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harvest?[edit]

The Battle portion states that the Normans were short of supplies because of the harvest. This is an oddly-phrased sentence. I will try to get to the meaning of it, but if someone can clarify, that would be great. LTC (Ret.) David J. Cormier (talk) 17:01, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Civitate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]