Talk:Bayesian poisoning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Internet  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Contradiction[edit]

According to this entry:

If spam filters are trained using these emails, there is a much greater chance that they will also mark incoming non-spam emails as spam, due to similiarities between those and the literary sources used to generate the poisoned emails.

According to the external link http://www.zdziarski.com/papers/boudville.txt

No, it won't increase false positives - it will simply cause the filter to look at different characteristics of legitimate mail.

Would someone like to reconcile these conflicting viewpoints? I am inclined to believe the latter source, as it is not anonymous and posted on a world-editable piece of shit website. -76.209.56.104 11:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Bayesian poisoning and Wikipedia[edit]

Spammers have now started to use Wikipedia as a source for Bayesian poisoning in their spam messages. JIP | Talk 09:31, 13 March 2010 (UTC)