This subject is featured in the Outline of Belarus, which is incomplete and needs further development. That page, along with the other outlines on Wikipedia, is part of Wikipedia's Outline of Knowledge, which also serves as the table of contents or site map of Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
No regular editors here.Xx236 (talk) 08:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Honestly, this was a one man article and once I left, I had a feeling it would have gone on the wayside. Anyways, what I have done was that I provided the citations in the lead about the UN join date (used the UN website as a source) and the public holidays (Pres. of Belarus website). I know the tools have moved so I do not have the website handy for the citeweb, but I will work with you guys on this. User:Zscout370(Return Fire) 01:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
If we follow the information sourced in Note 184, i.e. "58,9 % of Belarusians are believers. 82 % of them are orthodox, 12 % are catholics, 6% represent other denominations" and relate them to the total population for the year 2011 shown in "After WWII" table of Demographics of Belarus page (9,473,000 inhabitants), we get these values:
Eastern Orthodoxy: 48.30%
Roman Catholicism: 7.07%
Other religions: 3.53%
It seems that the table in Religion chapter is out of order. Carlotm (talk) 04:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Third paragraph in lead section contains very unrelated facts besides being cumulative (non-summary)
The third paragraph of the lead section contains some interesting demographic facts (urban nature of population, ethnicity, religion).
This is mixed in with some unrelated facts which basically boil down to reporting general agreement in the West that Belarus is not democratic and hasn't been for some years, that there's not much press freedom, and it is "repressed" (quotes in article) economically.
The article could be improved by separating the more objective part of the third paragraph (the demographics) from the assessments of its freedom since these are presumably unrelated.
If these assessments of its freedom are so important to knowledge of Belarus then they should probably be lumped in with the second paragraph which reports more concerns from the West about elections. Perhaps it could be summarized in one or two sentences? (E.g., "Western observers think Lukashenko leads a failed state denying basic freedoms and acts like a Soviet".)
And if the politics and social policies in Belarus are so important to an understanding of the country (more important than the climate, it appears), perhaps a word could be thrown in about income distribution, incarceration rates, and the number of foreign countries they send troops to. Surely these could be easily sourced without doing original research.
Why are neither English nor Belarusian names used in the largest cities section, but Polish ones instead ? Looks like rather something with a bad intentions. These are sensitive issues for whats should be neutral encyclopedia.
I mean Gomel which became Homyel, Mogilev which became Mahiylow, Grodno which became Hrodna etc. This should be corrected with English names. Nowhere else would you find that names of the cities of a certain country are written with a language of completely another country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 12:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)