|WikiProject Politics / Oligarchy||(Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)|
Because open source software may be forked, such "dictatorships" are fully voluntary and incorporate the democratic ideal of "consent of the governed". This statement is highly POV. And it doesn't make sense. A dictatorship is by definition not voluntary for anybody but the dictator. A dictator may (needs to) enjoy some support, but even consent to be ruled over is not democracy. According to Popper, democracy requires that the leader can be overthrown, not that some subjects can sail off to an island and found a new state. There's a huge cost involved with forking. Unpopular forks and fragmented projects will just die and all effort will be in vain. "Benevolent dictators" are always self-appointed, they are alpha types who want to keep ownership and control, but offload the work to the crowd and get free publicity.--22.214.171.124 (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- It's a bad analogy that someone just made up. I've removed it. Recury (talk) 20:16, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
I don't have any sources, but oftentimes economic modelers use the construct of a benevolent dictator to describe an altruistic planner who optimizes the entire economic system's operation for the common good. This probably could use some mention here if anyone has the relevant sources or experience. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 18:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
benevolent dictator versus corrupted elected government
It would seem that a benevolent dictator does more good for his or her country than the waste that ensues when an elected government is corrupted by external money just to get elected. Dictators such as Castro, Khadafi and to some extent Chavez have put their lives on the line so that their homeland could be run more efficiently to the benefit of its citizens who receive free medical care, education and transport. In some cases, the dictator allows a government to be elected for the day-to-day decision-making and as in the case of Chavez allowed his dictatorship to be confirmed through general election. Compared to the prime example of "democratic" government, the United States of America, where more than half of the congress is indebted to the Jews of the U.S.A. and Israel and where more money is spent on overseas adventurism for the benefit only of major corporations to the detriment of its own people, the regimes of Castro, Khadafi and Chavez must be commended. In the case of the U.S.A. where the "elected" President caves in to the corrupted demands of his congress that has been bought by lobbyists, government is definitely NOT of the people, by the people for the people but for the Corporations instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 16:57, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. --184.108.40.206 (talk) 16:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK, I agree as well, but wtf does that have to do with the article? Good paragraph, though. Xzpx (talk) 07:38, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Tone seems to be adequately encyclopedic
I came to this on the basis of the community pages, as an article needing style editing. I saw one sentence that was clumsy and adjusted it, but don't see problems with the tone or style. It seems adequately encyclopedic to me. So, I am removing the category that flags it for problems with tone. Of course, if someone disagrees, they can put it back, but if they do it would help to point out specifically what the problem is. AlbertBickford (talk) 07:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
I know nothing about Kārlis Ulmanis (haven't even read the article), but I noticed that searching for 'Kārlis Ulmanis benevolent' via Google gives me several hits (some of them - several books - may be reliable). Maybe Google Books has more hits. --220.127.116.11 (talk) 14:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- This article is not currently protected on any level, as far as I can tell, and many battles in the edit war have been conducted by named editors (I'm looking at you, Tuvixer). — Harry (talk) 08:14, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
This one sentence of the lead has caused like 90% of edits in the last year or so. In the aim of culling down the lead and adding an onus for evidence, I have removed many of the named leaders/dictators, leaving only three names on the basis of being well-cited or generally undisputed. These are Tito, Atatürk and Lee; these names are examples that illustrate the concept for uninitiated readers and are less likely to lead to confusion than others like Roosevelt or Marcos.
If you wish to restore other names, please do so in the new section (Benevolent dictators), providing discussion of their reign and the use of the term to describe it. I have added Tito to prompt people, but please do edit this section, as I'm by no means an expert. This approach should (fingers crossed) lead to constructive argument and a more informative article than the current bickering over a small (but growing) sentence of the lead.
In case you're looking to start sections on other leaders, I have transcribed the previous entries and their "citations" here: Bourguiba Park Chung-hee Roosevelt Qaboos bin Said al Said Kagame Abdullah II of Jordan Ferdinand Marcos
I will be playing gatekeeper for a while here. DO NOT mess with the names in the pertinent sentence in the lead without very good reason. If your favorite "benevolent dictator" isn't mentioned in the lead, add him(/her) in the relevant section, but be prepared to defend your claim with more than a token citation. (Might be worth seeing this Reddit thread for some examples, if not great citations.) — Harry (talk) 09:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Ah, I don't seem to recall that the idea of a philosopher king from plato or in general the term benelovent dictator refers as stringintly as here to someone with "pro western" stances :-)! I do jest a little bit but it seems that many of the descriptions themselves seem to include this as an example of benelovency. Relativism much? Of course, you only take things sourced in western media. Honestly though I do not disregard the list. I might add the King of Bhutan to it who measures the success of his country in accordance to the standard "GNH" or "Gross National Happiness"! If someones intentions ever were enough at least I think he should have a place... 18.104.22.168 (talk) 21:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Benevolent dictatorship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120201152634/http://portalimprensa.uol.com.br:80/colunistas/colunas/2009/02/25/imprensa374.shtml to http://portalimprensa.uol.com.br/colunistas/colunas/2009/02/25/imprensa374.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.
- Upshur, Jiu-Hwa; Terry, Janice; Holoka, Jim; Cassar, George; Goff, Richard (2011-01-20). Cengage Advantage Books: World History. Cengage Learning. ISBN 1111345147.
- Rowley, Chris; Bae, Johngseok (1998-01-01). Korean Businesses: Internal and External Industrialization. Psychology Press. ISBN 9780714649245.
- Giovacchini, Saverio (April 2004). "Book Review: Benjamin L. Alpers, Dictators, Democracy, & American Public Culture: Envisioning the Totalitarian Enemy, 1920s-1950s". The American Historical Review. American Historical Association. 109 (2): 553. doi:10.1086/530428.
- "Oman's benevolent autocrat may avoid a similar fate to Libya's Gaddafi | Rowland White". the Guardian. Retrieved 2015-11-25.
- Kigali, David Smith in. "Paul Kagame's Rwanda: African success story or authoritarian state?". the Guardian. Retrieved 2015-11-25.
- "Kagame turning Rwanda into a great African story". www.independent.co.ug. Retrieved 2015-11-25.
- "King Abdullah II of Jordan: Modern Monarch and Would-Be Peacemaker? - Harvard Political Review". Harvard Political Review. Retrieved 2015-11-25.
- "King Abdullah II of Jordan, World Statesman?". www.jadaliyya.com. Retrieved 2015-11-25.
- "THE DOWNFALL OF MARCOS". www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil. Retrieved 2015-11-25.