Talk:Bermuda at the 2008 Summer Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBermuda at the 2008 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 26, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bermuda at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:25, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll will begin reviewing this article as soon as possible!--Dom497 (talk) 00:25, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    See comment section below. Good.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Article complies with MoS.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Everything looks good regarding this section of the review.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    All references are reliable.
    C. No original research:
    No original research found.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    All major aspects regarding the topic of the article have been covered.
    B. Focused:
    Article stays focused through out.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    No bias found.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Article is stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    This section can not be answered as there are no images in the article. (See comment section below). Good.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    See comment section below. Better.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Please see comment section below. PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • Get ride of all the links to articles that don't exist. Once the article is created (when ever that will be) the link(s) can be added back.
    • I have dealt with all the redlinks. I found enough sources to create articles on pretty much the entire Bermudan delegation, so I went ahead and created those articles. --Starstriker7(Talk) 18:01, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do a search on Flickr (as an example) for at least one picture that relates to at least some of the info mentioned in the article. An article like this should have at least one image.
    • I tried Flickr and could not find any pictures relating directly to the Bermudan appearance at Beijing. I additionally tried the names of athletes, and found results, but I am unsure of how the licensing works for such images (like with Kiera Aitken, for example). I recall that on articles like Saint Lucia at the 2008 Summer Olympics, it was acceptable for me to use pictures of structures. To do that may be better than nothing, but it would serve a primarily illustrative purpose instead of adding to the article. I'll add it in and can remove it if you feel it is out of place. --Starstriker7(Talk) 18:01, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Dom497 (talk) 00:40, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Regarding the second point made in the comment section, I know when I reviewed the Vanuatu at the 2008 Summer Olympics, I passed it even though it had no images. The Bermuda at the 2008 Summer Olympics is greater in length and the article seems "empty" without a picture. Adding a picture is just a suggestion! If an image can not be found, the article can still pass the review after the first point in the comment section is addressed/fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 00:46, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bermuda at the 2008 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]