Talk:Big data

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 25, 2009Articles for deletionDeleted
April 21, 2010Articles for deletionKept
July 25, 2012Articles for deletionKept

Government[edit]

The texts on U.S., India, and UK were copied from https://www.ijedr.org/papers/IJEDR1504022.pdf. Copyright issue?--K3vinvmp (talk) 19:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

The material in the article appears to pre-date that publication; at least the US part. Kuru (talk) 22:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Some journals like these do not care about copyright violations, and surprisingly many authors (in particular from india and china) copy from Wikipedia and get away with it. When seeing such an overlap, always check the Wikipedia version at that time - it most likely already contained the text before that paper was published... HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 20:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

[1]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 03:12, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ M. Maciejewski, To do more, better, faster and more cheaply: using big data in public administration,International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol 83, Issue 1_suppl, pp. 120 - 135 doi: 10.1177/0020852316640058 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0020852316640058

Definitions, Socio-Economic Aspects, Society Impact, and Characterization of Data Sources[edit]

The article mainly focuses on the mainstream opinions around Big Data, but neglects many notions, definitions, and ideas about Big Data that exist outside the typical mainstream opinion. The article would require some better definitions, ideas around the concept of Big Data, and a more clearer categorization of the actual data sources. Many time Big Data is simply nothing else than a database plus a bit of analytics. The article would require some polishing and additions which are not in the mainstream opinion - or which are new ideas for describing the concept of Big Data.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Big data. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big data. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 29 January 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 14:28, 5 February 2019 (UTC)



Big dataBig Data – It is a name, not just a normal sentence. I can't move the page myself, so this is more of a move request rather than a discussion. Bageense (talk) 13:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Oppose the move. Capping data sets seems at odds with our general guidance on caps. Primergrey (talk) 14:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Oppose most sources use "big data" unless in a title; Wikipedia doesn't use title case for concepts such as this unless they would typically be capitalised within a sentence. Peter James (talk) 16:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Oppose. It's not a proper noun. The current title capitalization is correct. Rreagan007 (talk) 20:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Oppose. "Big Data" suggests that the topic is a proper noun instead of a concept, while "Big data" does not. MinerRo (talk) 17:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.