Talk:Bill Graham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography (Rated Disambig-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Disambiguation page Disambig  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Disambiguation
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
 

Untitled[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 10:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Whereas Bill Graham (promoter) is not well known and the others on this disambiguation page are "Billy Graham" (which is itself another disambiguation page) and now that Bill Graham (politician) is the leader of the opposition in Canada; should this page now point to Bill Graham with a disambiguation page for the rest? - Jord 01:00, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree with that. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 01:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

Voting[edit]

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
  • Support Jord 01:19, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Support I don't think we'll need a vote, you can go right ahead and do it. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 01:21, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment I don't think this move meets the definition of a move that can be done without consensus and, in any event, to do a move like this you would have to be an admin, which I am not ;) - Jord 01:23, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
      • I guess that means I have to do it. ;) --a.n.o.n.y.m t 01:24, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Support, you should have waited, though. —Nightstallion (?) 10:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

All done. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 01:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Oppose. Even though this move was already done. The talk page is difficult to find now to discuss this. To assume that it will not need consensus is wrong. Vegaswikian 03:28, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved after a whole 7 minute discussion period? I hope other new admins aren't so trigger-happy.[edit]

I agree with Vegaswikian that this move should not have been done. And I agree with damn near everyone that this move shouldn't have been made out-of-process, making the discussion hard to find. 24.18.215.132 03:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Recent moves[edit]

I'm not sure that I oppose the recent moves but there should probably been some discussion first. I'm going to keep the page names but redirect "Bill Graham to the Canadian politician until there has been a discussion first. --JGGardiner 07:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The page was not moved. It was turned into a redirect and then copy and pasted to new page name. I've reverted that. olderwiser 01:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
That is correct. I suppose in my head I was thinking of moving content around rather than the WP concept of page moves. --JGGardiner 05:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)