This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I think I have gotten the lead section cleaned up and streamlined; it now shows notability a little more clearly.DoctorG (talk) 16:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think I was succesful in replacing some of the primary sources with secondary ones and cleaning up the references already in place. There's more to be done, but it seems to be in a much better workable place now.DoctorG (talk) 17:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An editor tried adding this edit [1] to the lead. I have reverted it because it doesn't belong in the lead when there is nothing on that in the main section and per WP:BLP we would need to be much more careful about WP:NPOV and sourcing requirements. We should also avoid words like "controversial" in wikivoice. It is notable, however, that the article has some stuff about Johnson's views but nothing about his theology and beliefs, which have attracted controversy. I am not opposed to something like a Theology section, perhaps called "Theological views" to go with the political views section. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 16:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe just a "views" section? As far as I can tell Johnson doesn't distinguish between the theological and the political, RS seem to present it as part of the same religious package. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:28, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
