This template is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Surely a prion would be considered a biological agent as it is a self replicating, infectious, transmissible agent? There is no mention of them in this article.
No evidence that it should be considered "weaponizable". (Not all "replicating, infectious, transmissible agents" are biological threat agents. E.g., flu virus, HIV, malaria, etc, etc...) 184.108.40.206 (talk) 16:47, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Prions are not among the currently (or past) listed Select agents. Perhaps no reason to think that they ever would be. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 18:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Biohazard by Ken Alibeck mentions Soviet work on Ebola and Marburg. No sign of this here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 02:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Added Marburg. No evidence the Soviets ever weaponized Ebola. (We're not listing the 1200 potential bio-agents that have been researched. Just the ones ultimately weaponized.) 22.214.171.124 (talk) 18:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC)