Talk:Birthright (disambiguation)

There is a draft for this page located at Draft:Birthright (disambiguation).

Lack of Legal or Philosophical Doctrines/Ideas

It seems odd that the disambiguation page does not contain legal ideas or the historical (and one imagines philosophical) origins of the notion(s) of birth right.

ConcernedScientist (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Junuxx (talk) 10:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 October 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 02:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Birthright → Birthright (disambiguation) – Draft:Birthright is in sufficient shape to move to mainspace as the clear primary topic of the term. Move the current disambiguation page to make way for the draft. BD2412 T 03:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support, with thanks to BD for nursing this draft through a long gestation. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. For this to to be a primary I'd like to see some data backing up the claim that this is the primary topic, which I highly doubt. Let's see in a few months after it moves from draft if it pulls the numbers that show it. --Gonnym (talk) 01:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- After it moves from draft to what title? BD2412 T 01:14, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It seems like a valid broad concept article and therefore the de facto primary topic._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:24, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.