Talk:Bison latifrons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
I'll just leave this here. Not enough on this page for the image to fit in real well, but I think it's interesting enough when the article does expand. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 21:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Untitled[edit]

The text says that Latifrons went extinct about 20 ka bp, but the image shows a vertebra with a (presumably human) Atlatl point in it, dated to 4-3.5 ka bp. 98.248.37.60 (talk) 03:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bison latifrons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

This bison never had over 3000kg and over 2.5m at the shoulder[edit]

Why some users are keep changing this? http://library.sandiegozoo.org/factsheets/_extinct/bison_extinct/bison_summary.html Porbably even the 2000kg weight is wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.48.210.235 (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Maybe because you rarely bother providing a reliable citation and then attack other users in order to assert ownership of articles?--Mr Fink (talk) 03:09, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Rarely? Every edit I made have reliable citation. I never attacked other users, I only defend myself, the only guy I "attacked" was the one who call me nobody (you), I wasn't the one who started this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.48.210.235 (talkcontribs)
So, can you go ahead and provide some reliable citations, like from a scientific journal or text, that back up the changes in dimensions you've made already, or are you going to continue proving my own point?--Mr Fink (talk) 23:46, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Sure, as always I provide reliable sources I don't know what you are talking about. If it's in this page, in case you don't know some users are changing the weight and height 0f 2000kg to over 3000kg and 2.5m to 2.7m or something withouyt any sources, I don't see you complaining about that and you went as far as supporting vandalism from those users (by changing the correct body size of this bison) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.48.210.235 (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

https://books.google.pt/books?id=kUAKgNfiAvoC&pg=PA113&dq=Bison+latifrons+body+size&hl=pt-PT&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZyOG9qdXfAhUIlhQKHXIwAQAQ6AEIMTAB#v=onepage&q=Bison%20latifrons%20body%20size&f=false Found something here. The weight is listed as 1250kg, now this is a reliable source — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.48.210.235 (talk) 23:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC) https://books.google.pt/books?id=-QxQAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA36&dq=Bison+latifrons+body+size&hl=pt-PT&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZyOG9qdXfAhUIlhQKHXIwAQAQ6AEIQzAD#v=onepage&q=Bison%20latifrons%20body%20size&f=false Another, "as large as the modern bison"