This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
...the narrative is unnecessary due to the eminent realism presented. No, whether'eminent' or 'obscure'. For some idea of what painterly realism looks like, compare realism (arts). Try "clear, simplistic graphic illustration" or something along that line.-- Wetman (talk) 10:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
The excessive quotations from copyrighted works in the footnotes are unnecessary to the understanding of the article. The content in the footnotes could be recast in original wording, removing the need to quote so extensively. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria and Wikipedia:Non-free content regarding using copyrighted material without permission in Wikipedia. Thanks, MathewTownsend (talk) 17:51, 23 August 2012 (UTC)