From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


It looks as though one of their products Beat is bundled with malware. I personally got 3 separate malicious packages installed when I installed it. Many other users have had the same problem (links below) I would like to add an entry to relay the information, but an Über-wikipedian won't let me edit the page.

If anyone else has better, more definitive or authoritative links please edit the page to alert unsuspecting surfers as to the pitfalls with installing their software.

Geordie1977 (talk) 04:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

I agree, the structure of WP is more and more diving into some good old hierarchy of grumpy mini-fuhrers, defeating the idea of a community based encyclopedia entirely. Blinkx is very clearly associated with malware/adware/fishy script and that should be allowed to be mentioned, otherwise it looks as though the aforementioned structure is not any longer independent (meanwhile also a known fact that should be mentioned in the WP article about WP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
) (talk) 07:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

I arrived here looking for information on their suspicious PC program; this article presents Blinkx as a very legitimate company. There ought to at least be a section noting their malicious software practices. bendodge (talk) 12:43, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

If you care to add one, here's an instructive reference:   Maproom (talk) 14:22, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
@Maproom: Thanks; I did some reading on it and wrote a short summary. Seems there's been quite a battle between Edelman and Zango, and now blinkx. bendodge (talk) 00:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


Blinkx is now "part of the RhythmOne group" as per website TOS. Don't know if that's a renaming or buy out. But the company is no longer trading as BLNX but under RTHM on London stock exchange. The company's mostly operating as an ad network, AFAIK, video search seems defunct via, while the umbrella company has recently acquired All Media Network. Zuckerberg (talk) 15:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

@Zuckerberg: I'd petition that if some editor takes the time to transmogrify BLNX into RTHM (or whatever their current corporate structure is) that the editor preserve at least one mention of the adware connections. Many people come here seeking information about blinkx-branded software on their computers. Yet another rebranding shouldn't automatically whitewash the controversial adware history. bendodge (talk) 16:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
@Bendodge: Agreed. Let's wait for someone who is inclined to commit...

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blinkx. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

YesY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)