Talk:Prospect Park Boathouse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal[edit]

Now that there is a nifty article on the Boathouse, why not lighten up the section A slow recovery in the Prospect Park (Brooklyn) article, by moving some of that material to this article here? I furnished much of the material there, and it all seems to be the nucleus of this article, but now misplaced. Once I hack through the thicket of various things I'm working on, I'll undertake to do it, but anyone is welcome to beat me to it, or, as their wont, discuss the proposal here. Take care. Gosgood (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent idea. Of course, like any Wikifool, I too am overloaded and eager to see someone else carry out an excellent idea. Incidentally I'll be at a computer club dinner meeting Tuesday evening, Jan 6, 7-9 PM, at the Park Plaza Diner, Cadman Plaza West and Pineapple. All Wikinerds are welcome. Jim.henderson (talk) 02:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I support the proposal so long as it involves moving only some of the material, not the entire section. Of the five paragraphs, only portions of two pertain to the Boathouse alone. Hertz1888 (talk) 05:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So, after the merger was pending most of a year, I did it. Clumsily. Both articles now fail to move smoothly from idea to idea, due in part to the boathouse and the park losing their connection in the historical thesis of decline and resurgence. In a few days I hope to study how to fill the gaps and sand the joints neatly. I'm too frazzled right now for this kind of thought, and tomorrow is for a photographic expedition (New Jersey) that will leave me too tired. Thanks for the little things you cleaned up, and I hope you, Garry, and other thoughtful editors will make larger improvements before I return to these articles. Jim.henderson (talk) 00:06, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boathouse on the Lullwater of the Lake in Prospect Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 December 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Boathouse on the Lullwater of the Lake in Prospect ParkProspect Park Boathouse – The WP:COMMONNAME is "Prospect Park Boathouse" or just "The Boathouse". I don't think the extended name is used anywhere other than the NRHP listing; it should be mentioned in the article of course, but it shouldn't be its title. Pharos (talk) 17:30, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.