Talk:Bob Ferguson (infielder)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBob Ferguson (infielder) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 12, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
May 26, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Merge[edit]

I agree that Bob Ferguson (baseball player) should be merged into Bob Ferguson (baseball). I wrote the former only because I didn't know that the latter existed.Carlo 03:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just did the merge, but I do not know how to delete the original page. Could someone do that? And is it still considered a stub? Carlo 03:13, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nickname[edit]

I reverted a user explanation for Bob Ferguson's nickname ("because of his single career home run"). As far as I know, the reason for his nickname is unknown. A baseball blog named for him (http://www.deathtoflyingthings.blogspot.com/) says: "The origin of his unusual nickname remains a mystery, although most people believe it was because of his defensive prowess as an infielder. A more colorful explanation alleged that Ferguson liked to throw balls at birds prior to games."

He did have one career home run in the professional leagues. But 1) he was well-known well before that, and may well have hit more; 2) the home run was not the major deal it is today; 3) fans really didn't track statistics like they do now; and 4) most Home Runs were in the park, anyway. It sounds to me like as though the explanation for the nickname came from the statistic, not the actual nickname. Carlo 18:32, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Just a note that I'm finally getting around to reviewing this, should have something up tonight. So far I read the lead and it's good. I normally dislike cites in the lead, but I also see why those sentences would need them. Wizardman 16:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Now, the comments:

  1.  Done*"Ferguson played for two of New York's most fabled semi-professional clubs...", and "This win brought to an end the fabled Red Stockings' 81 consecutive game": What do you mean by fabled? Seems like an awkward choice of words.
  • Eliminated the word fabled, not needed.Neonblak (talk) 16:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Done*"The advantages that switch-hitting creates are such things as batting left-handed batters against right-handed pitchers, or vice-versa, which puts the batter in a better position to get a base-hit and help the team.": True, but seems out of place in this article. Reword to make it flow better or remove.
  • Eliminated the sentence, placed there by peer review suggestion, awkward.Neonblak (talk) 16:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Done*"he was receiving loud, verbal abuse throughout the game by notorious umpire-baiter, Mutuals catcher Nat Hicks.": A statement like that would need to be cited.
  • removed "notorious umpire-baiter", and added citation, most of that paragraph is from the same article.Neonblak (talk) 16:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Done*All quotes need to be cited (i see more then one that isn't).
  • All quotations should now have an immediate ref. made a few wording and structural changes as well. Will take one final read through to fix any other needed changes.Neonblak (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Done*Create articles for Al Thake and Art Hagan if you can. (I can do this if you wish, shouldn't be a problem)
  • I'll put this article on hold; you'll have a week to fix what I found. Then I'll look over the article a second time. Wizardman 17:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • ok, completed noted suggestions, anything else that needs fixing, let me know.Neonblak (talk) 20:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll re-review the article tomorrow to see if it's good or if I missed anything. Wizardman 02:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After further review, I'm going to pass the article. Wizardman 18:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spoken article notes[edit]

Hello all. I went ahead and read the article, the file is called Bob_Ferguson_Baseball.ogg. If you listen, you will hear me stumbling slightly in some places. A few of these are just my read, but if you listen and read, you will see some punctuation issues. Please give this a listen, if you like it feel free to post it. If the article is copyread, drop a note on my talk page if you would like me to re-read it. Vulture19 (talk) 11:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bob Ferguson (infielder). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]