Talk:Bolivian peso

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Numismatics (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numismatics articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Bolivia  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

rate[edit]

Aloha,

The GHC excel file says the peso boliviano replaced the old boliviano at a thousand to one (1:1000) as is given here, but the GHC text entry says it was a hundred to one (1:100). Do we have some source for which is correct? Gecko G 06:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Details[edit]

Can I suggest that the highly detailed information about the coins and banknotes be hived off into two new articles?
Dove1950 (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Eventually, perhaps. The stub has just been expanded (and probably should no longer be called a "stub"). It is still very short and concise. Splitting it too soon would result in a loss of coherence. I would suggest waiting for the addition either of images of all the coins and notes or of even more detail. "Detailed" is a relative concept. Right now, the information on the coins and notes is quite basic. A "highly detailed" account would include much more information on design (face and back), security features, date of release, signatures, serial numbering, etc., etc. Sivasova (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
To me, once we get down to giving catalogue numbers, we've reached the point when we should be dividing the article up, retaining an overview of denominations issued here. I agree it's not a stub any more.
Dove1950 (talk) 19:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)