Talk:Bombardier Challenger 600 series

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Proposed merger[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as Merge - only dissenting user has done no work on article since his last post. - BilCat (talk) 18:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bombardier CC-144 Challenger → Bombardier Challenger 600

(See Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages for details on performing mergers.)

Rationale - Minimal content at this point, factual errors (most C_-144s were CL-600s and 601s). Already better covered on main page. - BilCat (talk) 02:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge although only relevant info should be moved as some of it is incomplete, it says they are all 604s which is not true as per BilCat. MilborneOne (talk) 19:28, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Against merge since article has been updated and stands on its own now. It will probably end up being too big to be merged with C600. My .02 :) Tntdj (talk) 00:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There's still not been much improvement to the text, and much of it is based on a questionable source that uses a lot of speculation and opinion. There's a lot I can do to improve the articel, such as adding Infobox and footer templates, but that's just filler for the most part. Anyway, I'm not judging the article by the absence of those items anyway, as I have a good idea what it would look like with them. If you can concentrate on adding some sources that are more reliable, including detailing the several variants that the CF has used, and filling in some history, that would be good, and we'll see what it looks like in a week. - BilCat (talk) 00:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

loaded weight[edit]

Empty weight: 9,292 kg (20,485 lb)
Loaded weight: 19,618 kg (43,250 lb)
Useful load: 1,814 kg (4,000 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 19,550 kg (43,100 lb)

The loaded weight can not exceed the max. takeoff weight, if the loaded weight is correct I guess the max. weight will be between 20,500 - 23,000 kg

Greetings from Berlin :) Kilon22 (talk) 23:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Expose numeric variants in the TOC?[edit]

Should the table of contents be pushed down one more level so we can instantly skip down to say CL-605? Hcobb (talk) 01:28, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and removed the TOC limit as unnecessary, as most articles don't need it. Btw, thanks for moving the MSA info here. I was going to do it, but you beat me to it. - BilCat (talk) 01:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MSA question[edit]

The refs I've seen imply that the MSA has much of the sensor gear of the P-8, but no weapons. Does anybody have a head to head comparison ref that goes into the details? Hcobb (talk) 12:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bombardier Challenger 600 series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130822072944/http://www.turkmenairlines.com:80/en/aircraft-fleet to http://www.turkmenairlines.com/en/aircraft-fleet

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bombardier Challenger 600 series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Main pic change[edit]

current, OK but bland
Proposed: top view better shows its configuration
alternative: the jet takes more space
other alternative

After going through 1,200 commons pics, here are the most useful for a main better pic.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 22:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Coahuila Crash[edit]

The Aviation Safety Network, which is used as a citation for this particular crash, lists the total number of fatalities in the crash as 13. The NTSB, however, gives a figure of either 14 or 16. The NTSB notes that they received this information from the DCAG, which has jurisdiction over the investigation, but there does not seem to be any reports about the accident currently on the DCAG website.

If possible, it would be helpful if someone perhaps more versed in Spanish than myself might be able to help resolve this discrepancy.--Waterfire (talk) 01:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]