Talk:Bosnian mujahideen

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 January 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep (no consensus).

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Bosnia and Herzegovina Low‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Bosnian mujahideen is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam: Islam and Controversy Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Islam and Controversy task force.

Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Size estimates[edit]

I have added a section with more in-depth discussion about size estimates ([1]). I fixed some references and added some more sources that are frequently cited. I updated the lede and infobox accordingly. The lowest bound (500) is given by the CSIS (without citing any source) and the highest bound (up to 6,000) is given by Schwartz. CSIS claims that the preponderant estimates are 1,000-2,000 but that is simply not true. 1,000-2,000 is given by Thomas Hegghammer (cited by CSIS) and most other sources give estimates between 2,000 and 4,000. In any case, I have just explained estimates from all reliable sources that are frequently cited. --MarioGom (talk) 10:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the 500 figure cited by CSIS (without attribution) in 2017 is more likely to correspond to the number of mujahideen who established their residence in Bosnia after the Dayton Agreement, rather than the peak size in 1995 pre-Dayton. This is just my guess, but I have not included it since there is no clear source. --MarioGom (talk) 10:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mixing links with Al Qaeda and ISIS[edit]

Pincrete: I think links with Al Qaeda and ISIS should not be mixed. On the one hand, links with Al Qaeda were a major facet of mujahideen in Bosnia in the 1992-1995 period. On the other hand, ISIS did not even exist, and any possible link is of different nature. The former is about Al Qaeda involvement with mujahideen in the Bosnian War and the later about the relation of former mujahideen in Bosnia with ISIS. I think this would also apply to links with 9/11. Maybe the problem is that the article currently fails to discuss Al Qaeda in the "Bosnian War" section, too. --MarioGom (talk) 22:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't necessarily disagree, it was simply that one of those mentioned, was actually convicted for recruiting on behalf of ISIS, He needs to leave the section if we are going to have AQ only, the alleged links to which are much more numerous I believe.Pincrete (talk) 23:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pincrete: Right. And it is actually in the "After the war" section. I think your last change is good, given the current scope of that section. --MarioGom (talk) 23:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]