Talk:Bosnian pyramid claims
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bosnian pyramid claims article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8|
|The Arbitration Committee has permitted Wikipedia administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor editing this page or associated pages.|
|Bosnian pyramid claims received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.|
|WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina||(Rated C-class)|
|WikiProject Skepticism||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2017
|This edit request has been answered. Set the
Can you please update your sources for this page. Other than on source, everything else appears to be from 2006 and 2008. I would like to read current evaluations on this dig, fake or not. Digs progress in value, credibility, and origin analysis. When I read this page, it was a bit embarrassing that the source material was so dated, and the page not kept up. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 16:59, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. You need to propose the actual changes yourself here, provide the text you want added and/or changed, and provide the reliable sources to back it up. (An edit request is purely to ask someone who has sufficient privilege to make the actual change because the page is protected, but you still have to do the work yourself.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Update needed and upgrade needed soon
Claims? Sorry, some regret that old text-book writers ("peers"?) do not accept new discoveries at it might devalue the price of their books. This behaviour is normal in history. Cite error: A
<ref> tag is missing the closing
</ref> (see the help page). Many new scientists support the find. <ref>http://www.ancient-code.com/finnish-scientist-spots-great-mystery-bosnian-pyramids/<ref> <ref>http://anamericaninbosnia.blogspot.de/2016/07/new-lidar-scan-of-bosnian-pyramid.html<ref> (Rangutan (Munich) (talk) 00:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)) RRG2017
- Sorry, that's nonsense. No scientist worries about their books being devalued by real discoveries, let alone this stuff. Doug Weller talk 19:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- It's worse than nonsense: It's completely backwards. It's the Foundation that is trying to protect their value.
- Note that Osmanagic and the Foundation are unreliable in their claims, especially on the viewpoints of others. --Ronz (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed; no update is currently needed. The financial value of books is not pertinent. This scheme is supported by no scientific literature. Cpaaoi (talk) 01:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bosnian pyramid claims. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717134402/http://www.e-a-a.org/statement.pdf to http://www.e-a-a.org/statement.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.