Talk:Boy Meets Curl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Television / Episode coverage (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of television on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the episode coverage task force.
 
WikiProject Animation / American (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American animation work group (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject The Simpsons (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Simpsons, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to The Simpsons on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Good article Boy Meets Curl has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
March 19, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Boy Meets Curl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

{{subst:#if:This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.|


This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.|}}

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    {{subst:#if:In the Plot, "When Bart discovers Lisa busking on a street corner, and offers to help her kick her pin-collecting addiction", is the "and" needed? In the Production section, this is me, but, this sentence ---> "...feel that the exposure the sport will receive will be beneficial", reads odd.
    Check.|In the Plot, "When Bart discovers Lisa busking on a street corner, and offers to help her kick her pin-collecting addiction", is the "and" needed? In the Production section, this is me, but, this sentence ---> "...feel that the exposure the sport will receive will be beneficial", reads odd.
    Check.|}}
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    {{subst:#if:Question: Why isn't "Bart" linked in the Plot? In the Reception section, "With or without the timeliness of the story and setting, "Boy Meets Curl" was a fast and funny episode certain to be a highlight of the season" ---> "With or without the timeliness of the story and setting, 'Boy Meets Curl' was a fast and funny episode certain to be a highlight of the season". Same section, "The A.V. Club" needs to be italicized.
    Check.|Question: Why isn't "Bart" linked in the Plot? In the Reception section, "With or without the timeliness of the story and setting, "Boy Meets Curl" was a fast and funny episode certain to be a highlight of the season" ---> "With or without the timeliness of the story and setting, 'Boy Meets Curl' was a fast and funny episode certain to be a highlight of the season". Same section, "The A.V. Club" needs to be italicized.
    Check.|}}
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{2acom}}}|}}
    B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{2bcom}}}|}}
    C. No original research:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{2ccom}}}|}}
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{3acom}}}|}}
    B. Focused (see summary style):
    {{subst:#if:|{{{3bcom}}}|}}
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{4com}}}|}}
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{5com}}}|}}
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{6acom}}}|}}
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{6bcom}}}|}}
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    {{subst:#if:Not that much to do! If the concerns above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!|Not that much to do! If the concerns above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!|}}

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Both have been fixed, thank you very much for the review. -- Scorpion0422 15:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
You are welcome for it, just doing my part. Thank you to Scorpion for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Factual errors[edit]

I believe the article should be edited to highlight glaring factual errors, such as the announcement of nations as 'not competing but observing', and the inclusion of a women's pole vault competition in the 1952 games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.64.134.67 (talk) 11:31, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean with the first part, but you are right about the second part. There were no pole vault event for women in 1952 (only men). --Maitch (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2011 (UTC)