This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.
I've moved this from the spurious Pali title, which is absurd for a Mahayana text. Peter jackson (talk) 11:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps it should actually be under the Chinese title. Peter jackson (talk) 12:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
I decided to maintain the Sanskrit title as-is, but add Chinese and Japanese titles as well, for reference. This is similar to how other articles are done, allowing for consistency. Thanks! --Ph0kin (talk) 10:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
What about the fact that many/most/all scholars regard the Sanskrit title as spurious & this as being a Chinese work (or maybe Central Asian? Doesn't seem to be mentioned. Peter jackson (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)