Talk:Brigadier (United Kingdom)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:UK-Army-OF6-shoulder.svg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:UK-Army-OF6-shoulder.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brigadier (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brigadier (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merging the text of Brigadier-general (United Kingdom) into this artilce[edit]

I have merged the text of Brigadier-general (United Kingdom) into this article. Neither article was very large — Brigadier-general (United Kingdom) was only about 3k in size.

I merged the text into this article because it was confusing having both stubby articles with the easy misunderstanding in the categories that brigadier-general was still an active British military rank. Also most people who simply want to look up UK equivalent with other militarise, should not have to wade through a history lesson to learn what the rank is called today. If they want the history much better to look at the current name and then a section on history. -- PBS (talk) 11:01, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More on Empire period needed[edit]

The Arab Legion (1920s-1956) had this rank, and when I looked it up here, there was nothing on this time span. I have started a discussion on the general topic here. Arminden (talk) 08:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]