Talk:British Armed Forces

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

7th boat of the Astute-Class[edit]

Is not named HMS Ajax. It has never been officially named.

Boat 7 not HMS AJAX. page 20 page 28 "HMS Astute, HMS Ambush, and now Artful, are the first of the Class to be accepted by Navy Command, which is responsible for operating all of the Royal Navy's vessels. The next two submarines in the Class, Audacious and Anson, are currently being built in Barrow, with Agamemnon and the unnamed Boat 7 to follow."

Phd8511 (talk) 15:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Military age[edit]

I know people join at 16, but should there not be a note pointing out that it is 18+ for active duty (or however it is technically phrased)? Sumorsǣte (talk) 20:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Navy Marines[edit]

see /Archive 2#The Royal Marines are an arm of the Royal Navy

Sir Michael Fallon the British Defence Secretary was interviewed on BBC Radio 4 on the Today programme

The Daily Express reported it thus: Defence Secretary Sir Michael Fallon refuses to rule out cut to number of Royal Marines

The Ministry of Defence is facing a £10 billion funding shortfall over the next ten years, and plans to reduce the number of marines include removing the frontline role of one of its three commando units, according to The Times.

The Conservative Cabinet minister said there was "not a lot" that he recognised in the report but repeatedly sidestepped questions over cuts to numbers.

He told Radio 4's Today programme: "We have got 7,000 Royal Marines. The actual balance, the number of sailors and the number of marines, that's a matter for the First Sea Lord to keep under review."

Told it was noticeable that he was failing to deny there would be cuts to numbers, he replied: "What I am saying to you is we have 7,000 Royal Marines and it is for the First Sea Lord, who runs the Royal Navy, to look all the time at the balance between marines and sailors, and I have not agreed any cut in the size of the Royal Marines.

Because the MOD has clearly linked the Navy and the Marines together, I think it is time to remove the Royal Marines from this page as it is misleading to present the Navy and the Marines as to separate and equal entities. -- PBS (talk) 15:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

The Marines are undeniably part of the Navy, but I think the current format of a separate sub-heading for the Marines works well. They are a very difference sort of force to the Navy and this difference should be highlighted. Stingray Trainer (talk) 09:34, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Armed Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)