This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
It seems fair enough to merge the two. Although they were two different stages of the movement the line of development was continuous. I would suggest, however, retaining this article as the main one and merging British Fascisti into it, whilst retaining it as a redirect. Keresaspa 13:17, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I would strongly dispute the allegation that the British Union of Fascists "National affiliation" was with the Conservative party. Certainly they campaigned for the Conservatives, as they were realist enough to know that the choice was between a Conservative government or a "socialist" Labour one. That does not make then affiliated to the Labour party. That is like saying that the Communists were affiliated to the Labour Party.Royalcourtier (talk) 07:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
